Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate perturbIC to using mule #6

Open
atteggiani opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Migrate perturbIC to using mule #6

atteggiani opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@atteggiani
Copy link
Collaborator

It would be beneficial for perturbIC to be using mule to process UM fieldsfile data, instead of the custom umfile module.

This will allow standardisation of functions and making testing and implementation of new functionalities simpler.

Important

Currently, mule cannot handle UM fieldsfile timeseries (LBCODE 31320/31323, reference from UM F03 Document) properly. This makes fixing this issue more complex than it could be.
Before switching to mule, we need to make sure a proper way to handle timeseries is found and the "mule-enabled" scripts work well with timeseries.

@atteggiani
Copy link
Collaborator Author

More info about problems with mule: #3 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants