You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be beneficial for perturbIC to be using mule to process UM fieldsfile data, instead of the custom umfile module.
This will allow standardisation of functions and making testing and implementation of new functionalities simpler.
Important
Currently, mule cannot handle UM fieldsfile timeseries (LBCODE 31320/31323, reference from UM F03 Document) properly. This makes fixing this issue more complex than it could be.
Before switching to mule, we need to make sure a proper way to handle timeseries is found and the "mule-enabled" scripts work well with timeseries.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be beneficial for perturbIC to be using mule to process UM fieldsfile data, instead of the custom umfile module.
This will allow standardisation of functions and making testing and implementation of new functionalities simpler.
Important
Currently, mule cannot handle UM fieldsfile timeseries (
LBCODE
31320/31323, reference from UM F03 Document) properly. This makes fixing this issue more complex than it could be.Before switching to mule, we need to make sure a proper way to handle timeseries is found and the "mule-enabled" scripts work well with timeseries.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: