Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Landfast-ice settings #241

Open
anton-seaice opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Landfast-ice settings #241

anton-seaice opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
cice6 Related to CICE6

Comments

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor

Dan Atwater has found that turning on Tensile strength (i.e. the plastic response to strain) in CICE works well, and recommends we set the Ktens = 0.2.

To get fast-ice, we would also need to turn on probablistic sea bed stress.

This wouldn't have much impact in the Antarctic, but would grow Arctic fast-ice. There are NSIDC observations (which?) of Arctic sea-ice which include ice-age or ice-type to compare to.

@anton-seaice anton-seaice added the cice6 Related to CICE6 label Nov 19, 2024
@adfraser
Copy link

In Antarctica we don't need to turn on either of the sea bed stresses - well, we could, but neither of them should do much at all, since our bathymetry is much deeper than the deepest keel for most of the shelf. At least setting Ktens to 0.2 would give tensile strength which would lead to more fast ice in embayments, but realistically we won't get much without grounded bergs for now. That's OK - Dan is working on an alternative parameterisation which will be relatively easy to get into OM3 without needing grounded bergs blocking the ocean.

In the Arctic, to get realistic fast ice there, we should turn on either of the sea bed stress schemes, but the LKD one is better-tested according to J-F Lemieux. The probabilistic one is more sophisticated but hasn't been tested as much.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cice6 Related to CICE6
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants