Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

StorageClassName: standard does not always do what we want #127

Open
chaen opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

StorageClassName: standard does not always do what we want #127

chaen opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@chaen
Copy link
Contributor

chaen commented Jan 10, 2025

storageClassName: {{ .Values.global.storageClassName }}

Having this to stadard prevented to install the chart fresh on OpenShift. The reason is that Openshift at CERN does not define that type of storageclass

NAME                   PROVISIONER                       RECLAIMPOLICY   VOLUMEBINDINGMODE   ALLOWVOLUMEEXPANSION   AGE
cephfs (default)       cephfs.manila.csi.openstack.org   Retain          Immediate           true                   190d
cephfs-no-backup       cephfs.manila.csi.openstack.org   Retain          Immediate           true                   190d
cephfs-ssd             cephfs.manila.csi.openstack.org   Retain          Immediate           true                   190d
cephfs-ssd-no-backup   cephfs.manila.csi.openstack.org   Retain          Immediate           true                   190d
cvmfs                  cvmfs.csi.cern.ch                 Delete          Immediate           false                  599d
eos                    eosxd.csi.cern.ch                 Delete          Immediate           false                  449d

So either we are a bit smarter (e.g. testing if the value is defined, otherwise leave empty) or we make the value mandatory

@chaen chaen added good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Jan 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant