Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Buggy hybrid initialization in FGRAYRAD #1209

Open
islasimpson opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Buggy hybrid initialization in FGRAYRAD #1209

islasimpson opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working correctly CoupledEval3

Comments

@islasimpson
Copy link

What happened?

When trying to initialize a hybrid simulation with the FGRAYRAD compset, instead of initializing from the run specified in RUN_REFCASE etc, it initializes again from the analytic initial condition. A branch run seems to work OK. This has been instigated by this forum post: https://bb.cgd.ucar.edu/cesm/threads/hybrid-run-in-gray-radiation-aquaplanet.10956/

What are the steps to reproduce the bug?

Run one year of FGRAYRAD. Start again with a hybrid initialization from the first run and if you output daily average T and look at it, you'll see that day one of year 2 goes back to being symmetric in longitude, without any weather systems because it's starting back again from the zonally symmetric analytic initial condition.

What CAM tag were you using?

cesm2_3_alpha17f

What machine were you running CAM on?

CISL machine (e.g. cheyenne)

What compiler were you using?

Other (please specify below)

Path to a case directory, if applicable

/glade/work/islas/cesm2_3_alpha17f/runs/FGRAYRAD.001

Will you be addressing this bug yourself?

No

Extra info

No response

@islasimpson islasimpson added the bug Something isn't working correctly label Dec 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working correctly CoupledEval3
Projects
Status: To Do
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants