-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] GOOS Essential Ocean Variable (EOV) semantics #1568
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The qualities seem to fit a pattern - any reason not to use equivalence axioms?
We could. I'm setting up the base layers for the actual variables at this stage, so things are in flux. |
The notion of "composition" is semantically ambiguous. I'm treating it as equivalent to biodiversity (writ large) for the moment. I've asked for clarification from the GOOS BioEco Panel. Incoming clarifications [continuous update]
Further discussion between BioEco Panel members revealed differences in understandings and a few subtleties. Composition is understood as richness paired with identity, the basis of compositionality-based analysis (in the geological sense, adopted by ecology to correct for spurious negative correlations and related compositional effects). The conclusion of the thread is that the BioEco EOVs need to be disaggregated into various measures of diversity assessement (at the variable level, not the quality level I think). These will include alpha, beta, gamma diversity, composition, richness, and evenness. This is quite the explosion of classes, but seems necessary. |
Addressing #904
Ontological rendering of https://goosocean.org/what-we-do/framework/essential-ocean-variables/
General checks when class creation is complete:
"Biology and ecosystems"
"Biochemistry"
"Physics"
"Cross-disciplinary (including human impact)"