-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dependency graph instead of tree #6
Comments
|
Thanks for pointing this ; I'll play a bit more, but it seems to be doing what I need. In the few tries I attempted, I used
The result is
The result is Could you explain how the instance of parameter is chosen ? On another note, it seems that the documentation refers to Operation and Step as the same thing. I was searching for "step" and "dependency" (as shared dependency), but not "operation". It's neither defined in the JUBE tutorial, nor in the avanced one. Is there any page explaining the concepts (some structure documentation, not a tutorial) ? Best. |
|
Hello,
Currently, it seems to me that the dependencies we can express in the JUBE input can only be a tree. For instance, my input could look like this :
For the input above, the dependency of the steps would look like this :
However, my setup step is a bit costly in terms of compute resources, but not meaningful in terms of results (analysis): it simply produces some intermediate input from built binaries. Actually, I want to run it once only, using whatever of the build and run parameter that are specified. The dependencies I would like to express would look like this :
Note that the setup is executed once for all the run steps. Because of this, some nodes have 2 parents, thus moving from tree to graph structure. I would like something like this :
Is there a way to specify things using JUBE ?
Best.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: