You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am trying to analyze m6A sequencing data using m6Anet. I currently generated data from the Direct RNA sequencing kit. I used guppy and minimap2 in MinKNOW software for base-calling and alignment.
I separated one bam file into two files and run m6Anet with these three bam files. However, I realized the results (n_read count, modi_ratio, probability etc...) from these three bam files are different. I expect at least matched n_read numbers. (If file_A.bam and file_B.bam from original_file.bam, the sum of n_read of certain genes from file_A and file_B has to be the same as the n_read from the original_file.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello.
I am trying to analyze m6A sequencing data using m6Anet. I currently generated data from the Direct RNA sequencing kit. I used guppy and minimap2 in MinKNOW software for base-calling and alignment.
I separated one bam file into two files and run m6Anet with these three bam files. However, I realized the results (n_read count, modi_ratio, probability etc...) from these three bam files are different. I expect at least matched n_read numbers. (If file_A.bam and file_B.bam from original_file.bam, the sum of n_read of certain genes from file_A and file_B has to be the same as the n_read from the original_file.
Do you have any idea why it makes a discrepancy?
Thank you.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions