allocated-eic.ttl issues; representation at ONTO TEKG #24
Labels
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement
New feature or request
help wanted
Extra attention is needed
at:
ontology? (Its namespace doesn't resolve). I'd guess it doesn't include aat:start.use
prop. Use schema.org for this.<urn:iec62325.351:tc57wg16:451-n:eicdocument:1:0>
as the EIC ontology namespace is wrong. That's the namespace of the EIC XSD, but the ontology is a different thing. You need to create it, and then put it at a URL so it's resolvableeic:EnergyResource
But please mind that functions are inconsistently spelled, some multiple values are incompatibly used, and some functions don't conform to the EIC type (3rd char). See TEKG Validation below.
So we only used ProductionUnit and GenerationUnit, assigned after cleaning function values.
eic:
props are awfully long since they follow the XML nesting. I dare say people will hate using them.Eg
EICCode_MarketDocument.eICCode_MarketParticipant.vATCode_Names.name
talks about a document and a name, but what it means is the VAT of that party.Eg
eic:EICCode_MarketDocument.eICCode_MarketParticipant.streetAddress.townDetail.country
is an awful way to saycountry
PLEASE use simpler names, eg as below.
mRID
toeic
to make it clear what kind of identifier that isdocStatus
is always "A05" then omit it. In semantics, you first of all model real-world entities, not messages or documents about them<type/docStatus/A05>
eic:EICCode_MarketDocument.eICResponsible_MarketParticipant.mRID
is wrong because the value is not a mRID!It is a URL representing an energy resource (party).
So rename to eic:responsibleParticipant.
The latter are in the Production Units ("master data") message but I didn't see this converted.
I'll repost from Sveino/Inst4CIM-KG#80 how we represented EIC data in our ONTO TEKG knowledge graph.
(ask me for login and password if interested: give me your email).
tr.ttl
ontology that covers EIC and a lot of other data (time series, outages, etc)The last two are results of advanced SHACL validation that we performed:
You can see validation results at https://transparency.ontotext.com/app/validations, and further details about NO participants eg at
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: