Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 12, 2022. It is now read-only.

Look into adding the approved extra features #18

Open
2 tasks
NotCoffee418 opened this issue Feb 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Open
2 tasks

Look into adding the approved extra features #18

NotCoffee418 opened this issue Feb 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@NotCoffee418
Copy link
Owner

NotCoffee418 commented Feb 4, 2019

  • Sitout everywhere

  • Sitout on table vpip < x

@deMathias
Copy link
Collaborator

deMathias commented Mar 11, 2019

emulating clicking of sitting out is probably frowned upon by casino. Maybe with the press of hotkey stack all windows on top of eachother with the sit out button situated around the pointer area and minimize the window user just clicked in to sit out. After sitting out everywhere windows might reorder in the way they are specified in the profile.

@NotCoffee418 NotCoffee418 added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 30, 2019
@NotCoffee418
Copy link
Owner Author

NotCoffee418 commented Mar 30, 2019

@deMathias Nah should be fine. both stars & bwin have a sitout on all tables feature.
Though stars might not be too happy about SitOut on vpip<x - since it effectively defeats the purpose of their new anti seating script rules.
But asked, they allowed it so, seems like a useful feature.

Problem is, looking into it, I can't access the stars sitout checkbox to check it.
I'd have to resort to guesstimating the position and have an emulated mouse click on every table, which is kind of buggy-feeling for the user.
Or some dll injection solution which just isn't work the effort right now.

Or maybe even forceclose the table when user folds UTG, but that seems risky too since the blinds might still post and that effectively defeats the purpose of sitout next BB.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants