Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review metadata requirements from NFDI4Energy #222

Open
1 task done
Ludee opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
1 task done

Review metadata requirements from NFDI4Energy #222

Ludee opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
other: help wanted 🙋 Extra attention is needed part: documentation 📖 Improvements or additions to documentation priority: critical 🔥 Critical priority status: active 🚧 Work in progress type: feature 🛠 New feature or request

Comments

@Ludee
Copy link
Member

Ludee commented Nov 14, 2024

Description of the issue

NFDI4Energy has defined requirements for metadata.
Review all requirements in detail and comment on it.
Goal is to fulfil all requirements.
https://github.com/NFDI4Energy/metadata-requirements/blob/main/non-functional-requirements.md

Ideas of solution

Create a document commenting on all requirements.

Workflow checklist

@Ludee Ludee added part: documentation 📖 Improvements or additions to documentation other: help wanted 🙋 Extra attention is needed priority: critical 🔥 Critical priority type: feature 🛠 New feature or request status: active 🚧 Work in progress labels Nov 14, 2024
@Ludee Ludee self-assigned this Nov 14, 2024
@Ludee Ludee changed the title Review and comment on metadata requirements from NFDI4Energy Review metadata requirements from NFDI4Energy Nov 18, 2024
@Ludee
Copy link
Member Author

Ludee commented Dec 3, 2024

@vismayajochem
Copy link
Collaborator

vismayajochem commented Dec 3, 2024

What does ? as comment mean?

  • 1. tags -> keywords? Does the howl annotation process under fields play a role into 'Links between metadata records'?
  • 4. Where is it documented what fields are mandatory and what are optional? In the meta data key despricption only the badges are listed.
  • 5. How formal is this documentation? How improtant/relevant is the info, that nesting is annoying?
  • 12. What does 'Protege?' mean?
  • 8. forbetter -> for better
  • 11. JSOn -> JSON
  • 15. Some documentation already exists, no? It just needs to be updated to be compatible with v.2.0
  • 16. Is it still beeing developed or why is there no green hook? The badges are there, are the templates not?
  • What is with 19. and 20.? Are they so basic, they don't need further explanation?
  • 21. for the public available documentation ...
  • 24. tags -> keywords?
  • XX) 📝Metadata usage documentation shall be understandable for users that need to fill or read metadata: add tutorial https://openenergyplatform.github.io/academy/tutorials/99_other/oemetadata/

Ludee added a commit to NFDI4Energy/metadata-requirements that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2024
@Ludee
Copy link
Member Author

Ludee commented Dec 3, 2024

Identified work items:

OEMetadata:

  • 🛠 REQ-DESIGN-SCHEMA-FIELD-IMPORTANCE Update documentation with badges.
  • 🛠 REQ-USE-SCHEMA-DOCUMENTATION-STAKEHOLDER-USERS Add info from JSON schema to documentation (cardinality, mandatory, badges ..)
  • 🛠 REQ-DOCUMENTATION-VERSION-CONTROL mike for documentation versioning
  • 🛠 REQ-IMPL-SCHEMA-PROVIDED-FILES JSON schema modules for better maintenance. No turtle yet.
  • 🛠 REQ-INTEGRATION-SCHEMA-APPLICATION-REQUIREMENTS Add requirements to the documentation
  • 🛠 REQ-METADATA-TOOLING-INTEGRATION Develop templates for different ressources: timeseries, geodata, parameter...
  • 🛠 REQ-METADATA-FORMAT-STANDARDS Add RDF. Extend the json-ld context #232
  • 🛠 REQ-USE-RECORD-DOCUMENTATION-STAKEHOLDER-USERS Update to 2.0

OMI:

  • 🛠 REQ-INTEGRATION-SCHEMA-STANDARD-INTEROPERABILITY Implement mappings and crosswalks in OMI
  • 🛠 REQ-STANDARD-EXPORTS Implement crosswalks in OMI.
  • 🛠 REQ-DOCUMENTATION-TERMINOLOGY-DIFFERENCES Include SKOS in the metadata crosswalks in OMI.
  • 🛠 REQ-CURATED-CONTROLLED-VOCABS Improve workflow!
  • 🛠 REQ-USE-RECORD-SIMPLE-UI Feedback wanted.
  • 🛠 REQ-METADATA-TOOLING-INTEGRATION Implement mappings in OMI (ongoing development)
  • 🛠 REQ-REVIEW-RECORD-FORMAT-VALIDATION Check patterns and licenses.
  • 🛠 REQ-METADATA-TOOLING-VALIDATION Implement check licenses, etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
other: help wanted 🙋 Extra attention is needed part: documentation 📖 Improvements or additions to documentation priority: critical 🔥 Critical priority status: active 🚧 Work in progress type: feature 🛠 New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants