Descriptions for date fields clashes with examples and what the type is called

[hmpf]

When a field is marked to be of the type "Date", the examples show a date without time, but the description always includes "Encoded using the relevant ISO 8601 Date and Time compliant string". Not: "and Time". So, is a date + time also valid or should the description contain just "Encoded using the relevant ISO 8601 Date compliant string".

[SotosTsepe]

@hmpf good catch. We are going to update the description of the Date type fields by removing "and Time". The values in these fields must follow the YYYY-MM-DD format.

[SotosTsepe]

Taking a look at the DateTime fields, I strongly suggest that we use a timezone designator so that we avoid localization problems. Format should be YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssTZD, as specified in ISO 8601. TZD can be expressed with Z, +hh:mm or -hh:mm.

EDIT: It is already reported in #66 (comment)