You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
E.g. in distribution, the access_url and download_url have the data type URI. But they have URL in their name and they are obviously supposed to be links that lead to a webpage/download. In my opinion, URI is the wrong data type here, since URIs could either be a URl or a URN. URNs are just a unique name, with no way to access the resource behind the name. As opposed to URLs, which do offer a way to access the resource described. So in short, every URL is a URI, but not all URIs are URLs.
This ambiguity also affects other parts of the schema. As a software developer, I would like clarification on this issue, to validate inputs correctly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
E.g. in distribution, the access_url and download_url have the data type URI. But they have URL in their name and they are obviously supposed to be links that lead to a webpage/download. In my opinion, URI is the wrong data type here, since URIs could either be a URl or a URN. URNs are just a unique name, with no way to access the resource behind the name. As opposed to URLs, which do offer a way to access the resource described. So in short, every URL is a URI, but not all URIs are URLs.
This ambiguity also affects other parts of the schema. As a software developer, I would like clarification on this issue, to validate inputs correctly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: