-
Hi all! Super new to Stackstorm, and after reading docs, past discussion threads and googling, I still cannot figure this out. I have this workflow:
That works great, and I get this result:
Next I try to add a new step using
But the output indicates that
It's worth noting that the validation will end up being more complex than that, I just simplified to try to get the data passing correctly from action to action. I also tried both YAQL and JINJA, the snippet here has a mix of both, which I've read is not in the best practices. Doc I followed: https://docs.stackstorm.com/orquesta/languages/orquesta.html#with-items-model I tried the I appreciate any help, docs, examples, whatever that will allow me to get unblocked. Thanks in advance! Edit for versions:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I think I got it for anyway following along: Seems like the value inside of My working workflow:
Hope that helps someone some day. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Well done for identifying your issue. Perhaps you can update the Orquesta documentation to make it clearer about the fact that the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I think I got it for anyway following along:
Seems like the value inside of
item()
is available just during the command execution and not afterwards. Instead of usingcore.noop
, I switched tocore.local
and did a bash validation +succeeded()
andfailed()
controls.My working workflow: