Update SBOL_INLINE and SBOL_REVERSE_COMPLEMENT to new URIs

[tcmitchell]

See SynBioDex/SEPs#111

[tcmitchell]

Support for SO_FORWARD and SO_REVERSE were added in PR #327. I think we should leave SBOL_INLINE and SBOL_REVERSE_COMPLEMENT as they are since they are allowed and programs may want to make explicit checks for the URLs they represent. This means that there is no work to do on this issue.

[jakebeal]

Given that there is a SHOULD relation, would it be appropriate to mark SBOL_INLINE and SBOL_REVERSE_COMPLEMENT as deprecated, or otherwise encourage people away from them?

[tcmitchell]

would it be appropriate to mark SBOL_INLINE and SBOL_REVERSE_COMPLEMENT as deprecated

We could, and I considered that. But it's not as easy as marking a function as deprecated. See https://www.scrygroup.com/tutorial/2019-06-27/module_level_deprecations/

That seemed heavyweight enough that I was reluctant to do it. We absolutely can though. Let me know your thoughts @jakebeal

[jakebeal]

That seems like not too bad a lift. I'd suggest going ahead with marking them as deprecated.