Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Committee chairs and members should not use control vocabulary. #57

Open
devangm opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Committee chairs and members should not use control vocabulary. #57

devangm opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@devangm
Copy link

devangm commented Apr 17, 2024

  • Currently, students fill these fields out, and I would prefer that remain so. Otherwise, faculty fluctuate so much that it would be onerous to update the list constantly. We would also be inundated with questions when students couldn’t find a committee member. Correcting the occasional student mistake would be easier than keeping the faculty list current.
@jmicah
Copy link
Member

jmicah commented Apr 17, 2024

Could this be accomplished by modifying the field from the admin UI instead of in code?

@devangm devangm changed the title Committee chairs and members should not be able to control vocabulary. Committee chairs and members should not use control vocabulary. Apr 17, 2024
@wwelling
Copy link

@jmicah yes, you should be able to configure these inputs from the admin settings.

As admin:

  • select Organization tab
  • select organization to modify
  • select Manage workflow
  • expand DOCUMENT INFORMATION
  • select field to edit

Image
Image
Image

I would recommend that we still back Committee chairs and members by a controlled vocabulary and allow free text if not found. I would not anticipate anyone manually maintaining this controlled vocabulary of people, but it rather be some automation tasks in the future.

Also, controlled vocabularies can be maintained with a CSV.

Image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants