You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When working on the .copilotignore feature, one thing I kept going back to is why does this have to be a file in a folder. Why can't we support a plugin setting that is a blanket setting.
This is most useful when being present with files which are common across projects. But not necessarily containing a .copilotignore file.
I am thinking that we just implement a setting
.copilotignore which just mimics what a file might contain.
I don't see much reason to not support this other than the consider added complexity or maintenance.
I don't see an issue with adding a feature that VS Code Copilot doesn't have, since they already have partial support of copilotignore files and most reports by people say it's only for enterprise
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No, we aren't supporting the same logic as .gitignore. In fact, we don't even support comments today. Which we probably should.
I don't think we need to be super complex, I just believe this would give an easy way to just have global setting.
As for the final patterns, since I don't believe we need to support things identical to .gitignore, we could just use a set to get unique values then store them normally.
When working on the
.copilotignore
feature, one thing I kept going back to is why does this have to be a file in a folder. Why can't we support a plugin setting that is a blanket setting.This is most useful when being present with files which are common across projects. But not necessarily containing a
.copilotignore
file.I am thinking that we just implement a setting
.copilotignore
which just mimics what a file might contain.I don't see much reason to not support this other than the consider added complexity or maintenance.
I don't see an issue with adding a feature that VS Code Copilot doesn't have, since they already have partial support of copilotignore files and most reports by people say it's only for enterprise
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: