You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the genotype call is interpreted from the GT field, which is not always reflective of the PL field. GT is determined somewhat based on Hardy-Weinburg, which does not apply to our populations.
Though this is the ideal approach for our own group, I can't help but wonder about other prospective users of the loader. Is using PL a generic approach? Or will other groups want to load genotypes solely based on GT? Should we make it an option?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the genotype call is interpreted from the GT field, which is not always reflective of the PL field. GT is determined somewhat based on Hardy-Weinburg, which does not apply to our populations.
Though this is the ideal approach for our own group, I can't help but wonder about other prospective users of the loader. Is using PL a generic approach? Or will other groups want to load genotypes solely based on GT? Should we make it an option?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: