You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@XingangPan
It is now 2021, SCNN (proposed over 3 years ago) has become the classic method for lane detection and still pose a challenge to SOTA methods. But the old torch7 code and matlab evaluation is just not enough for the community anymore. So we have been working on a unified lane detection codebase, and have now re-implemented a PyTorch version of SCNN (https://github.com/voldemortX/pytorch-auto-drive) on 6 different backbones (VGG16, ResNet18/34/50/101, ERFNet) and achieved better results than originally reported in the paper (we attribute the improvements mainly to large batch size, better pre-trained weights, larger learning rate with warmup). For instance, we find VGG+SCNN can reach 74.29 F1 score on CULane, almost 3% higher than the paper result. More results are available in our model zoo.
Although we could not get the TuSimple competition performance (96.53%) from VGG + SCNN training on the train set alone, we assume that is normal since it was indeed a competition.
This can help researchers who use Python/PyTorch to ease reproduction efforts: #117#70#69#58#6
We would also be providing visualization tools and fair FPS tests across methods, which can help issues like this: #20
Maybe you could add a link to our PyTorch version in README.md to help promote the codebase?
p.s. We use python to map predictions to lanes, there is no need for matlab anymore.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@voldemortX Thanks for your efforts. Your pytorch-auto-drive code base looks great! It's glad to know that your reproduction obtains even better results. I have added the link in README.md.
@XingangPan
It is now 2021, SCNN (proposed over 3 years ago) has become the classic method for lane detection and still pose a challenge to SOTA methods. But the old torch7 code and matlab evaluation is just not enough for the community anymore. So we have been working on a unified lane detection codebase, and have now re-implemented a PyTorch version of SCNN (https://github.com/voldemortX/pytorch-auto-drive) on 6 different backbones (VGG16, ResNet18/34/50/101, ERFNet) and achieved better results than originally reported in the paper (we attribute the improvements mainly to large batch size, better pre-trained weights, larger learning rate with warmup). For instance, we find VGG+SCNN can reach 74.29 F1 score on CULane, almost 3% higher than the paper result. More results are available in our model zoo.
Although we could not get the TuSimple competition performance (96.53%) from VGG + SCNN training on the train set alone, we assume that is normal since it was indeed a competition.
This can help researchers who use Python/PyTorch to ease reproduction efforts: #117 #70 #69 #58 #6
We would also be providing visualization tools and fair FPS tests across methods, which can help issues like this: #20
Maybe you could add a link to our PyTorch version in
README.md
to help promote the codebase?p.s. We use python to map predictions to lanes, there is no need for matlab anymore.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: