You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
#pragma once is often preferred over header guards because it simplifies the code and reduces the chances of errors. #pragma once eliminates the need for manual definition of unique macros to prevent multiple inclusions. This reduces boilerplate code and the potential for mistakes, such as mistyping the macro names or accidentally reusing the same macro in different files. It can also potentially speed up compilation times, as the compiler can optimize the file inclusion process more effectively than with traditional header guards.
It's worth noting that while most modern compilers support #pragma once, it is not part of the C++ standard, so some very old or niche compilers might not support it. I don't think we need to worry about it considering the compilers we are targeting, but I just wanted to call it out.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
#pragma once
is often preferred over header guards because it simplifies the code and reduces the chances of errors.#pragma once
eliminates the need for manual definition of unique macros to prevent multiple inclusions. This reduces boilerplate code and the potential for mistakes, such as mistyping the macro names or accidentally reusing the same macro in different files. It can also potentially speed up compilation times, as the compiler can optimize the file inclusion process more effectively than with traditional header guards.It's worth noting that while most modern compilers support
#pragma once
, it is not part of the C++ standard, so some very old or niche compilers might not support it. I don't think we need to worry about it considering the compilers we are targeting, but I just wanted to call it out.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: