Spec: remove the JSON spec for content file and file scan task sections #9771
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
the
Specification
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved, as discussed on the dev list.
@stevenzwu: could you please link the dev list discussion to the PR for future reference?
|
Hey I am just back from my leave, sorry for the late review. Why not just remove these sections completely? The JSON serialization of ContentFile and FileScanTask needs to evolve in a backwards compatible way I think that is for sure, but it is at this point not something relevant with the core table spec, but more of an engine feature implementation detail right? |
They shouldn't be part of the core table spec although the JSON serializer is valuable for FileScanTask serialization. See discussion thread for more context: https://lists.apache.org/thread/2ty27yx4q0zlqd5h71cyyhb5k47yf9bv
done. let me also raise a vote thread for spec change. |
…ns. (apache#9771) They shouldn't be part of the core table spec although the JSON serializer is valuable for FileScanTask serialization. See discussion thread for more context: https://lists.apache.org/thread/2ty27yx4q0zlqd5h71cyyhb5k47yf9bv
…ns. (apache#9771) They shouldn't be part of the core table spec although the JSON serializer is valuable for FileScanTask serialization. See discussion thread for more context: https://lists.apache.org/thread/2ty27yx4q0zlqd5h71cyyhb5k47yf9bv
replaced with link to Java implementation and note for additional context.
See the discussion thread on dev mailing list.
https://lists.apache.org/thread/2ty27yx4q0zlqd5h71cyyhb5k47yf9bv