Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider decoupling the PS-DSCPM from back end #1

Open
gaelcolas opened this issue Dec 7, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Consider decoupling the PS-DSCPM from back end #1

gaelcolas opened this issue Dec 7, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@gaelcolas
Copy link

I know it's still early days, but it'd be nice to decouple the protocol handler (web API) from what happens in the back end (in your case, relying on your PullServerAdmin I assume, similar to how Tug does it.
Putting this in for tracking/discussion.

What do you think?
@bgelens
Copy link
Owner

bgelens commented Dec 10, 2018

Hi @gaelcolas. For now I'll keep it tightly coupled until I figured out the entire protocol. I agree with you that decoupling is the way to go.

@bgelens bgelens added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 10, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@gaelcolas @bgelens