Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 17, 2023. It is now read-only.

BCO Accession and Name sorting not working #204

Closed
kmartinez834 opened this issue Jul 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

BCO Accession and Name sorting not working #204

kmartinez834 opened this issue Jul 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@kmartinez834
Copy link

Describe the bug

On the Biocompute Object DB page, the BCO accessions are out of order. When I click on the Accession or Name header, an arrow appears (indicating that the rows should be sorted) but the order does not change.

To Reproduce

  1. Go to https://test.portal.biochemistry.gwu.edu/objects
  2. Use prefix search to generate list of GLY BCOs
  3. Click on "BCO Accession" or "Name" header

Expected behavior

Rows should be sorted in ascending or descending order, depending on arrow direction. Presumably, GLY_000001 would appear first if I click on the BCO Accession header.

Screenshots

If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

image

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: Windows10
  • Browser Chrome

Additional context

Add any other context about the problem here.

[ADD ANY ADDITONAL INFORMATION YOU FEEL WASN'T INCLUDED ABOVE. PUT N/A IF THERE IS NONE]

@HadleyKing HadleyKing added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 16, 2022
@HadleyKing
Copy link
Contributor

The table headers and tables in the page have not been updated in synch with the functions that generate the sort ability.

@HadleyKing HadleyKing added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Jul 16, 2022
@HadleyKing
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for reporting @kmartinez834. This is a duplicate of #168 and so will get closed.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants