You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For our sources, we store PMIDs as Documents. Some sources provide more information than others. For example, OncoKB only gives the PMID. Whereas CIViC gives authors + description. An example would be for pmid:22663011. Currently, we're just taking the first source that loads that document since there is an ID constraint in the db. We should think on how we want to handle this as we add more sources. Should we combine source data? Should we prefix the ID with the source it came from?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Some of this metadata, like article title and authors, should be objectively determinable -- we could use NCBI esearch/efetch to grab a minimum set of attributes for every article, regardless of what a source supplies.
That said, curated properties like a CIViC description definitely go above and beyond that.
given a DOI or PMID, fetch any basic metadata we might want (e.g. for display purposes -- author list, title, date, journal, issue/vol/no, etc). It's relatively safe to go between DOI <-> PMID so we can pick one as an identifier when it's available
if neither of the above is available, just fill in what we can and figure out some way to identify it
If sources DO provide PMID/DOI and additional metadata, we could check that the stuff they provide matches what comes out of our eutils lookup, and log/raise warnings for any discrepancies
For our sources, we store PMIDs as Documents. Some sources provide more information than others. For example, OncoKB only gives the PMID. Whereas CIViC gives authors + description. An example would be for
pmid:22663011
. Currently, we're just taking the first source that loads that document since there is an ID constraint in the db. We should think on how we want to handle this as we add more sources. Should we combine source data? Should we prefix the ID with the source it came from?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: