Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Namespace clash between adverbs on lexicon page and adverbs on sentential negation #701

Open
emilymbender opened this issue Feb 4, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@emilymbender
Copy link
Contributor

The attached choices file shows a situation where the user defines an adverbial sentential negation strategy on the sentential negation page and then gives an adverb with the same stem value on the lexicon page. The resulting tdl is mal-formed:

not := extra-neg-adverb-lex & neg-adv-lex &
[ STEM < "not" >,
SYNSEM.LKEYS.KEYREL.PRED "_not_a_rel" & "neg_rel" ].

The tdl generation should include the adverbs defined on the sentential negation page in the check that produces unique identifiers (e.g. not_2).

It's worth exploring whether a similar check needs to be performed for subordinators defined on the clausal mods page, or if this is already being done.
choices.txt

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant