Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why models perform worse on the 60% identity split LBA dataset than on the 30% split? #57

Open
Gloria-LIU opened this issue Jul 29, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@Gloria-LIU
Copy link

Hi,
Thank you for the amazing work!
I am curious about the results in table 8. Why most models (other than GNN) perform dramatically worse in the 60% identity split than in the 30% identity split? Intuitively, the task with 60% split should be easier and achieve better performance as there is more similarity between protein sequences.

@Gloria-LIU Gloria-LIU changed the title Why models perform worse in the 60% identity split than in the 30% identity split on LBA tasks? Why models perform worse on the 60% identity split LBA dataset than on the 30% split? Jul 29, 2022
@smiles724
Copy link

Hi, Thank you for the amazing work! I am curious about the results in table 8. Why most models (other than GNN) perform dramatically worse in the 60% identity split than in the 30% identity split? Intuitively, the task with 60% split should be easier and achieve better performance as there is more similarity between protein sequences.

I agree with your theoretical guess. However, not only atom3d but also some other following studies show the similiar phenomenon. For instance, the table below is copied from Multi-Scale Representation Learning on Proteins
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants