Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2023. It is now read-only.

Strange results from ZJU-Mocap 315 sequence #12

Open
shanemankiw opened this issue Jan 4, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Strange results from ZJU-Mocap 315 sequence #12

shanemankiw opened this issue Jan 4, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@shanemankiw
Copy link

Hi, thank you for sharing your work!

I tried to train your model on ZJU-Mocap 315 sequence following your configuration, the only difference is that I used only one RTX 3090. The training took about 2 days yet the evaluation result seems strange.

This is val_ind result:
5253_315_2012_1

This is ood result:
0876_315_51_11

The metrics seem to be acceptable though.
This is ind metrics log:
step=10000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=27.6131, ssim=0.9523
step=20000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.0429, ssim=0.9556
step=30000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.2928, ssim=0.9566
step=40000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=27.9075, ssim=0.9584
step=50000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.7775, ssim=0.9605
step=60000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.2880, ssim=0.9582
step=70000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.5239, ssim=0.9606
step=80000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.9092, ssim=0.9616
step=90000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.6294, ssim=0.9594
step=100000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.6554, ssim=0.9586
step=110000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.7274, ssim=0.9584
step=120000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.6370, ssim=0.9589
step=130000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.4819, ssim=0.9584
step=140000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.7621, ssim=0.9583
step=150000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.6087, ssim=0.9575
step=160000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.4336, ssim=0.9555
step=170000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.6071, ssim=0.9572
step=180000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.5575, ssim=0.9559
step=190000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.5406, ssim=0.9569
step=200000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.5062, ssim=0.9558
step=210000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.2677, ssim=0.9553
step=220000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.3719, ssim=0.9560
step=230000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.3678, ssim=0.9565
step=240000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.3076, ssim=0.9561
step=250000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.3422, ssim=0.9564
step=260000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.3457, ssim=0.9562
step=270000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.2343, ssim=0.9560
step=280000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.2339, ssim=0.9557
step=290000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.1508, ssim=0.9561
step=300000, test_render_every=5253, psnr=28.2380, ssim=0.9562

This is ood metrics log:
step=10000, test_render_every=876, psnr=24.9693, ssim=0.9287
step=20000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.3594, ssim=0.9310
step=30000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.3456, ssim=0.9363
step=40000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.7967, ssim=0.9402
step=50000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.8560, ssim=0.9385
step=60000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.7005, ssim=0.9362
step=70000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.9159, ssim=0.9374
step=80000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.9287, ssim=0.9380
step=90000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.9482, ssim=0.9385
step=100000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.7621, ssim=0.9363
step=110000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.6561, ssim=0.9364
step=120000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.6878, ssim=0.9379
step=130000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.6890, ssim=0.9383
step=140000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.8649, ssim=0.9381
step=150000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.8306, ssim=0.9383
step=160000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.7063, ssim=0.9366
step=170000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.5456, ssim=0.9353
step=180000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.5683, ssim=0.9353
step=190000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.5363, ssim=0.9356
step=200000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.5620, ssim=0.9333
step=210000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.4459, ssim=0.9329
step=220000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.3567, ssim=0.9333
step=230000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.3890, ssim=0.9334
step=240000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.4219, ssim=0.9330
step=250000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.3964, ssim=0.9336
step=260000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.3680, ssim=0.9336
step=270000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.3631, ssim=0.9335
step=280000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.3580, ssim=0.9333
step=290000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.3318, ssim=0.9334
step=300000, test_render_every=876, psnr=25.3467, ssim=0.9337

@liruilong940607
Copy link
Contributor

Hey sorry for the late reply. I didn't keep track of the issues here.

This is very odd. We did verified the code can reproduce the results in the paper. Have you already figured out something? Maybe a data setup issue?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants