Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
|
I just experienced the same. Generated a cloned voice via web (which is pretty good) and locally. Unfortunately, the local generation is not really good. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Unfortunately, I have discovered through hugginface's demo comments that they use the "Fish Large" model And they left us with the fish medium model. That's why there's a difference in quality. They also said that they don't think they'll release the large model. 😒 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Oh.. good to know. Thanks for letting me know. Well then, off looking for another model that can be run locally 😀 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I tried finetuning lora model with an hour speech data for each speaker, the quality is prettry good. for another model, cosyvoice2 local model is as good as its web demo. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Oh great! I still can't figure out/successfully train a LoRa on fish. How many hours were there in total approximately? Did you train the full cycle? (If I remember correctly, it's 10k steps?) Did you use the command line or the web interface? I am trying to train in Spanish. Perhaps for this language I need a lot more data than for English. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Doing a voice cloning using the Fish Audio website, gives the expected results and the voice is identical to the audios provided. However, doing the same in local, the resulting voice has nothing to do. At most a slight resemblance with the timbre, but not much more. It does not respect the accent.
Is there something I am doing wrong?
How can I replicate the results of the web page, which are displayed as instant cloning? Do I need to do a local fine-tuning? I don't see much sense in it, since it would not be instant cloning...
Thanks in advance!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions