Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Issue with 220 Use of Lagrange multipliers #44

Open
philsMINT opened this issue Jan 11, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Issue with 220 Use of Lagrange multipliers #44

philsMINT opened this issue Jan 11, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
@AndreG-P @philsMINT
Labels
major question

Comments

@philsMINT
Copy link
Member

indeces are composit expressions themselve! branch as child nodes?
Link to Use of Lagrange multipliers, qID 220
@philsMINT
Copy link
Member Author

replace formula?

@physikerwelt
Copy link
Member

what is the problem with this formulae here?

@philsMINT
Copy link
Member Author

indexes are composit expressions themselve, can we leave it like that?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@AndreG-P AndreG-P

@philsMINT philsMINT

Labels
major question
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@physikerwelt @AndreG-P @philsMINT