You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This year, there was some agreement that Git didn't do very well as a GSoC member, in particular in the number of projects merged and students retained. As a consequence, we are not participating this year. The relevant threads:
However, I and others believe that this abstention only has value if we spend the year thinking about how to improve. And I think git-merge is a good place to kick that off. I do not know the attendee list, but I know that at least one each of former admin (Jeff), mentor (me) and student (Carlos) will be there :-)
I will prepare a survey of the points made in the above threads and (as far as that is available to me) previous projects and results to get things started, but I would really like to see some open discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This year, there was some agreement that Git didn't do very well as a GSoC member, in particular in the number of projects merged and students retained. As a consequence, we are not participating this year. The relevant threads:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/216485
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/219298
However, I and others believe that this abstention only has value if we spend the year thinking about how to improve. And I think git-merge is a good place to kick that off. I do not know the attendee list, but I know that at least one each of former admin (Jeff), mentor (me) and student (Carlos) will be there :-)
I will prepare a survey of the points made in the above threads and (as far as that is available to me) previous projects and results to get things started, but I would really like to see some open discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: