You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be immensely powerful, being able to only let a given rule either apply or not apply to a given user.
Effectively, this could help admins secure [configuration] files that are not governed by System Integrity Protection (SIP) from any user(-s) or any other user(-s) than certain user(-s) - e.g. securing /etc/sudoers and /etc/sudoers.d/* from any user(-s) except your local admin or the user that your management solution (e.g. Jamf Pro) uses for management purposes.
This way, through the use of rules with Santa, you'd be able to secure otherwise vulnerable files from users exploring their sudo rights' capabilities in a potentially harmful manner.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be immensely powerful, being able to only let a given rule either apply or not apply to a given user.
Effectively, this could help admins secure [configuration] files that are not governed by System Integrity Protection (SIP) from any user(-s) or any other user(-s) than certain user(-s) - e.g. securing /etc/sudoers and /etc/sudoers.d/* from any user(-s) except your local admin or the user that your management solution (e.g. Jamf Pro) uses for management purposes.
This way, through the use of rules with Santa, you'd be able to secure otherwise vulnerable files from users exploring their sudo rights' capabilities in a potentially harmful manner.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: