Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

evals for max-disconnect-timeout escape GC #18747

Closed
tgross opened this issue Oct 12, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

evals for max-disconnect-timeout escape GC #18747

tgross opened this issue Oct 12, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@tgross
Copy link
Member

tgross commented Oct 12, 2023

While testing #18701 I ran into a weird bug in evaluation GC for evaluations created for max-disconnect-timeout. After purging a job and running nomad system gc, I expect to find no more evaluations for the job. But the evaluation for max-disconnect-timeout still exists:

$ nomad eval list
ID        Priority  Triggered By            Job ID  Namespace  Node ID  Status   Placement Failures
ba6f9a5d  50        max-disconnect-timeout  httpd   default    <none>   pending  false
@lgfa29
Copy link
Contributor

lgfa29 commented Oct 12, 2023

I think this is a dup of #12809.

(It seems like it's a yearly tradition for us to bump into this problem 😅)

@tgross
Copy link
Member Author

tgross commented Oct 13, 2023

Oops, thanks!

@tgross tgross closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 13, 2023
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants