new Image(width, height) or new image({width, height}) ?

[lpatiny]

Currently when creating a new Image the 2 first arguments are width and height.

Would it make sense to have rather width and height as mandatory parameter of the 'options' and have only one arguments ?

This would allow to simplify the 'decode' code like in:

https://github.com/image-js/image-js-typescript/blob/main/src/load/decodeJpeg.ts#LL17C1-L20C6

But also allow the following code (useful when sending an image to a webworker):

const rawImage = image.getRawImage();

const image2 = new Image(rawImage);

@targos WDTY

[targos]

SGTM.

Be careful with new Image(rawImage). It will only work with 8-bit RGBA images.

[lpatiny]

Is there a specific reason that we didn't return the image kind in getRawImage ?

image-js-typescript/src/Image.ts

Lines 466 to 472 in d3f0d99

	return {
	width: this.width,
	height: this.height,
	data: this.data,
	channels: this.channels,
	bitDepth: this.bitDepth,
	};

The idea was actually also to return the kind so that we can always use new Image(rawImage)

[targos]

There is no idea in this function. It's there as a workaround for some algorithms and shouldn't be used from other projects.