You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Originally posted by mine-cetinkaya-rundel January 20, 2025
Since the Get Started page starts with a reference to R for Data Science (which features the base pipe operator), I thought it might make sense for the package documentation to use the base pipe (|>) instead of the magrittr pipe (%>%). Is there a specific reason for using %>%? I tried a few of the code examples and it looks like |> could be a drop-in replacement for %>%.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Discussed in #55
Originally posted by mine-cetinkaya-rundel January 20, 2025
Since the Get Started page starts with a reference to R for Data Science (which features the base pipe operator), I thought it might make sense for the package documentation to use the base pipe (
|>
) instead of the magrittr pipe (%>%
). Is there a specific reason for using%>%
? I tried a few of the code examples and it looks like|>
could be a drop-in replacement for%>%
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: