Replies: 1 comment
-
Correct. You can however do "uuid from bytes" if you have some other form of smaller unique binary unique id. The reason we enforce uuids, is that there are "one too many developers" who don't realise the permanence of the field and that it can never be changed. As a result embedding PII is a huge issue, and even despite warnings people still did it. We took a strongly opinionated view and we want to force good behaviour here which is why we enforced UUID. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'm looking to add passkeys to a system that doesn't have UUIDs for users. Instead, a shorter random string with a wider vocabulary is used.
Am I understanding it correctly that
webauthn-rs
takes the opinion that users must have aUuid
, and that's it?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions