Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

transcr.: small fix w. metamark relocation #148

Open
BOberreither opened this issue Dec 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

transcr.: small fix w. metamark relocation #148

BOberreither opened this issue Dec 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@BOberreither
Copy link

BOberreither commented Dec 2, 2024

These relocation metamarks / their respective arrow-segs have some issues, some of which have good reasons (stemming from the reading version):
There is a pipe symbol and an extra line. Tried a workaround on page 5 (first occurrence), but I think it won't do any good. Goal would be: no pipe, no extra line, arrow inline (details below) and arrow in the margin.
One solution could be: Don't display anything for the metamark relocation, if it is connected to an arrow-seg. Just display two arrows for the seg, one in the margin left, one in the text flow. Watch out: This last arrow must not interfere with print text flow, but should be placed slightly to the left so it's in the indent-space. Let's try this and see if 2nd occurrence on page 5 works better then.
Also: On beginning of page 6 there should not be an arrow.

babslgam added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2024
@babslgam
Copy link
Contributor

babslgam commented Dec 2, 2024

sorry, referenced the wrong issue in the commit

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants