You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
These relocation metamarks / their respective arrow-segs have some issues, some of which have good reasons (stemming from the reading version):
There is a pipe symbol and an extra line. Tried a workaround on page 5 (first occurrence), but I think it won't do any good. Goal would be: no pipe, no extra line, arrow inline (details below) and arrow in the margin.
One solution could be: Don't display anything for the metamark relocation, if it is connected to an arrow-seg. Just display two arrows for the seg, one in the margin left, one in the text flow. Watch out: This last arrow must not interfere with print text flow, but should be placed slightly to the left so it's in the indent-space. Let's try this and see if 2nd occurrence on page 5 works better then.
Also: On beginning of page 6 there should not be an arrow.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
These relocation metamarks / their respective arrow-segs have some issues, some of which have good reasons (stemming from the reading version):
There is a pipe symbol and an extra line. Tried a workaround on page 5 (first occurrence), but I think it won't do any good. Goal would be: no pipe, no extra line, arrow inline (details below) and arrow in the margin.
One solution could be: Don't display anything for the metamark relocation, if it is connected to an arrow-seg. Just display two arrows for the seg, one in the margin left, one in the text flow. Watch out: This last arrow must not interfere with print text flow, but should be placed slightly to the left so it's in the indent-space. Let's try this and see if 2nd occurrence on page 5 works better then.
Also: On beginning of page 6 there should not be an arrow.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: