You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #1293 we decided to remove kedro build-docs. Some of the few users that did use the command expressed the following:
"It's more like a bonus for us than a real need. I like to provide to my team both auto generated doc and dag (w/ kedro viz), it help us understend each pipe/node." Are the docs generated as you expect? "Yes, I currently never encountered any issue relating to the auto-generated documentation" Is it enough to fulfil my needs? "Yes and no, the doc + the dags is great but it would be amazing to have a in-doc view of the dags (like this, no need to share screenshots of the viz)"
"I use it to document the pipelines I build and make the onboarding process smoother. I'm working for a university and apart from few others the majority of my colleagues are staying for 6 months to 3 years. The DAG and the docs makes it easier for them to understand the structure and quickly start working on the pipelines. [...] it would be cool to have the dag in the docs (maybe mermaid kind of dag that can be version controlled? 🙂 )".
This alludes to users having a need to document their workflow but not exactly as kedro build-docs did for them. We need to investigate what it is that users need.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In #1293 we decided to remove
kedro build-docs
. Some of the few users that did use the command expressed the following:This alludes to users having a need to document their workflow but not exactly as
kedro build-docs
did for them. We need to investigate what it is that users need.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: