-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Write function O-notation in prettier way using latex #55
Comments
Where exactly are the ocurrences of this? |
@cronokirby The functions that require documentation improvements are here: The same should be done for You can see example of how asymptotic specified in this PR: |
I guess I can give this a shot. |
Hi @0xd34df00d! Did you have time to work on this? Let us know if you stuck on something and need some further details or clarifications 🙂 |
@chshersh oh, I realized there're no complexity annotations right now, and I don't think I'm qualified enough to produce them off the top of my head! Did I miss something by any chance? |
@0xd34df00d Hmm, indeed, I can see how this can be challenging. No worries then! 🙂 |
@chshersh @0xd34df00d I've been adding complexity annotations as I touch functions and think I probably have the context loaded up to just go through and add them all if that'd help here. There are a few spots where some additional explanation is needed due to optimizations (at least after the work in a few of my other PRs); for instance At any rate; some explanation is likely better than no explanation 😄 |
@ChrisPenner Thanks for working on this! I believe, only a few functions will require O-notation annotations after your awesome work 💪 Haddock supports LaTeX, and I'd love to have O-notations formatted using pretty formulas as we did in |
Haddock supports that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: