From d3c2e6102fa598b21fbffc18ecfa448d729e1b91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kamil Raczycki Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:01:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] fix: readme typo --- README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index ad1b230..4a1223d 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ Library contains a logic to construct geometries (points, linestrings, polygons) You might ask a question: _How do I know that these geometries are reconstructed correctly?_ To answer this question, the `QuackOSM` has implemented dedicated tests that validate the results of `GDAL` geometries vs `QuackOSM`. -This might come as a surprise, but since OSM geometries aren't always perfectly defined (especially relations), the `QuackOSM` can even fix geometries that are loaded with weird artefacts by `GDAL`. +This might come as a surprise, but since OSM geometries aren't always perfectly defined (especially relations), the `QuackOSM` can even fix geometries that are loaded with weird artifacts by `GDAL`. You can inspect the comparison algorithm in the `test_gdal_parity` function from `tests/base/test_pbf_file_reader.py` file.