You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been searching for the fastest geodesic library for python and it seems yours is by far the fastest. This makes me both worried that some edge case is missing and at the same time very impressed :)
If the algorithm is indeed correct I suggest adding unittests and benchmark results to the front page in github.
as you can see they have similar results, with vincenty reduced by a few decimal digits, however vincenty is 30% faster than geopy and ~10x faster than geographiclib. Btw let me know if you know how to test against the gdist library, would be good to add.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
thehesiod
changed the title
Add benchmark notes
Add benchmark notes / unittests
Nov 7, 2016
I've been searching for the fastest geodesic library for python and it seems yours is by far the fastest. This makes me both worried that some edge case is missing and at the same time very impressed :)
If the algorithm is indeed correct I suggest adding unittests and benchmark results to the front page in github.
Here is my benchmark code and results:
results
as you can see they have similar results, with vincenty reduced by a few decimal digits, however vincenty is 30% faster than geopy and ~10x faster than geographiclib. Btw let me know if you know how to test against the gdist library, would be good to add.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: