Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No "Type Definitions" section #17

Open
Vasileios-Mavroeidis opened this issue Feb 5, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

No "Type Definitions" section #17

Vasileios-Mavroeidis opened this issue Feb 5, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@Vasileios-Mavroeidis
Copy link
Member

Vasileios-Mavroeidis commented Feb 5, 2022

The specification introduces new "Types" (Type Definitions) within Section 2.1.3.2 PF Arguments

A new section should be created for introducing the new types.

Ill correct that asap and attach the Pull Request to this issue.

@Vasileios-Mavroeidis
Copy link
Member Author

Discussed at the Feb 9 meeting and we will add a new section to address the issue

@dlemire60
Copy link
Contributor

PR #20 (created March 2022) removed subsections of 2.1.3 so that arguments from the LS and PF AP-specific arguments are all defined in the same section; that PR was not merged until July 2024. Notes from the 9 Feb meeting describe this as a non-normative change that was supported in principle. No corresponding PR appears in the closed PR list. Content of section 2.1.3 appears acceptable as-is.

Recommend closing this issue w/o further changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants