construction materials: record tests undertaken as part of construction

[odscjen]

Background

This issue relates to the following CoST IDS elements proposed in the CoST IDS/OC4IDS review:

Construction materials testing

Construction materials testing

Module: Social
Indicator: Health and safety

Disclosure format

Disclose materials tests performed during implementation [document]. These can include, without limitation, the following:

• Foundations
• Pavements
• Soil
• Steel structure
• Asphalt
• Retaining walls
• Concrete
• Masonry
• Roofs
• Compression
• Compaction
• Thickness
• Others (explain)

[Free text to add not mentioned tests]

OC4IDS mapping

Project level: Publish a summary of the material tests: 1. For each material test, add a code from the materialTests codelist to the.social.healthAndSafety.materialTests.tests array. 2. Optionally, add a further explanation of the material tests to .social.healthAndSafety.materialTests.description. Publish test results: For each test result, add a document, set .documentType to ‘materialTestResults’ and set .url to the URL at which the document is accessible.

Proposal

Add a .materialsTest object comprising a .type array of codes from the open materialTests codelist and a .description. Add a materialTests array of materialTest objects to social.healthAndSafety. Add the code ‘materialTestResults` to documentType codelist. (see the overarching social object issue for how this fits in with other social obligations related fields.)

Research is still required to fully define the codelist.

Add the following fields and objects:

Path	Title	Description	Type (format)	Codelist
social.healthAndSafety.materialTests	Construction materials tests	Information about tests conducted on materials used in the construction of the asset.	object	-
.materialTests.tests	Materials tests	The construction materials or elements that were tested.	array of strings	materialsTests
.materialTests.description	Description	A short description of the tests conducted on the construction materials or elements.	string	-

Add the following codes:

Codelist	Code	Title	Description
materialsTests	TBD	Foundations	TBD
materialsTests	TBD	Pavements	TBD
materialsTests	TBD	Soil	TBD
materialsTests	TBD	Steel structure	TBD
materialsTests	TBD	Asphalt	TBD
materialsTests	TBD	Retaining walls	TBD
materialsTests	TBD	Concrete	TBD
materialsTests	TBD	Masonry	TBD
materialsTests	TBD	Roofs	TBD
materialsTests	TBD	Compression	TBD
materialsTests	TBD	Compaction	TBD
materialsTests	TBD	Thickness	TBD
documentType	materialTests	Material tests	Documentation detailing the results of tests conducted on construction materials.

Example

{ 
 "social": { 
   "healthAndSafety": { 
 	"materialTests": { 
   	"tests": [ 
     	"retainingWalls", 
     	"roofs" 
   	], 
   	"description": "Tests were conducted of the main retaining wall and of the roof of each structure according to..." 
 	} 
   } 
 }, 
 "documents": [ 
   { 
 	"id": "1", 
 	"documentType": "materialTestResults", 
 	"url": "http://example.com/materialTestResults.pdf" 
   } 
 ] 
} 

Sources

cc @EvelynDinora

[jpmckinney]

I think the codes can be singular.

[odscjen]

@jpmckinney just to check what you mean there, do you mean that the code for e.g. "Foundations" can be "foundation"?

[jpmckinney]

I think both the code and title can be singular, as is already the case with soil.

[odscjen]

The initially suggested list is made up of 3 different types of thing:

1. types of material, e.g. soil, asphalt, concrete, masonry
2. elements of a construction, e.g. roofs, retaining walls, steel structures, foundations, pavements
3. types of test, e.g. thickness, compression, compaction

Given the modelling proposed I think this is an issue, for example if a user gave the following:

{
  "social": {
    "healthAndSafety": {
      "materialTests": {
	"tests": [
	  "retainingWall",
	  "concrete",
          "soil",
	  "thickness"
	 ]
      }
    }
  }
}

it ambiguous how these codes relate to each other. Was the “thickness” test conducted on both “concrete” AND “soil” or just one of the materials? Or maybe it was only conducted on the “retainingWall” and not the other elements that may also be made of “concrete”? By combining all of these things in a single list it risks making it seem like a project has conducted far more tests than they actually have. Expecting the .description field to provide all of this clarity feels very optimistic given the volume of tests a construction project can expect to perform.

I see 2 potential solutions:

1. the list is restricted to 1 of the 3 types, i.e. elements of the construction OR construction material types OR test types, with the associated documents providing all the rest of the information about the other 2 parts of the test.
2. we use the same sort of modelling as in climate measures: list climate measures planned using climateMeasures codelist and object in environment #402 and make materialsTests an array of materialTest objects each of which has a tests array of strings and a description. A materialTest object would describe a single test and in the documentation we’d need to instruct users to combine test codes appropriately to describe the test undertaken, e.g. “concrete”, “retainingWall”, “thickness”.

The 2nd option is complex, possibly too complex but does allow all of the information to be presented in a structured format. The 1st option is significantly simplier but more restrictive (although all of the information can still be shared in the associated documents)

What do you think @duncandewhurst @EvelynDinora @mgraca-prado

[jpmckinney]

Good catch. It would help to know how this information is typically tracked or monitored. It seems a bit strange to me that some source system would only have tracked that a "thickness test" had been performed.

[odscjen]

@EvelynDinora @mgraca-prado any thoughts on this? Do you have access to any datasets that demonstrate how this information is currently currently being captured? Or could you ask Hamish (I think I remember in a previous chat Maria you said that this data point was his suggestion)?

[EvelynDinora]

@odscjen let me check with Hamish. I will come back to you ASAP

[mgraca-prado]

Hi @odscjen and @EvelynDinora ,
There are many standard codes for testing of construction materials such as ASTM international, Eurocodes, IS Codes, BS Codes,etc. See here: https://theconstructor.org/building/codes-material-testing/25284/
To simplify the data point, maybe we could create the following categories (the list was created based on the key tests referred to in the link above) and requesting the PE to identify the applicable standard (plus document disclosure of the tests performed)?
List of materials tests:
Asphalt
Aggregate and rock
Bricks
Cement
Concrete
Coarse and fine aggregate
Masonry
Metallic materials
Mortar
Plywood
Timber
Resin and polymer
Soil
Stone
Other (explain)

[odscjen]

ah ha, thanks @mgraca-prado that's really useful.

So to keep this simple (and to avoid having to keep any codelists up-to-date with multiple construction standards that aren't open) we could make the codelist "constructionMaterial" and use the list of materials Maria has listed in the previous comment. And then in the mapping instruct the publisher to list the specific standard tests they've conducted.

e.g.

{
  "social": {
    "healthAndSafety": {
      "materialTests": {
        "materials": [
          "masonry",
          "concrete",
          "aggregateAndRock"
        ],
        "description": "ASTM C617, ASTM C1231, ASTM C88"
      }
    }
  }
}

With the mapping guidance

Project level: Publish a summary of the material tests:

1. For each material tested, add a code from the constructionMaterial codelist to the .social.healthAndSafety.materialTests.materials array.
2. Add a further explanation of the material tests to .social.healthAndSafety.materialTests.description including the code of the relevant international or national standard the test conformed to.

Publish test results: For each test result, add a document, set .documentType to ‘materialTestResults’ and set .url to the URL at which the document is accessible.

@jpmckinney @mgraca-prado @EvelynDinora how does that sound?

[odscjen]

constructionMaterials.csv open codelist

Code	Title	Description
asphalt	Asphalt	A composite of bitumen and aggregate, used to surface, for example roads, airports and parking lots.
aggregate	Aggregate	Coarse to fine-grained particulate mineral material, including sand, gravel, crushed stone, slag and recycled concrete.
brick	Brick	Mass-produced rectangular unit, used to construct, for example, paving, walls and other building elements. Commonly used in masonry.
cement	Cement	Substance used for binding and hardening other construction materials.
concrete	Concrete	A composite of cement, water and aggregate.
metal	Metal	Metal, including steel, aluminium, iron, copper, lead and other alloys and naturally occurring metals.
mortar	Mortar	A composite paste, used to seal and bind masonry units.
plywood	Plywood	A composite manufactured material composed of thin layers of wood veneer glued together.
timber	Timber	Wood processed into uniform sizes and shapes.
resinAndPolymer	Resin and polymer	Natural or synthetic material made up of large repeatable molecular chains, including epoxy resin, plastic, rubber, vinyl and sealant.
soil	Soil	The upper layer of the earth's surface composed of organic matter, minerals, liquids, organisms and gases. Also known as earth.
stone	Stone	Naturally occurring mineral material that has been quarried, extracted and worked to create a solid unit. Commonly used in masonry.

Sources for definitions

• asphalt - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asphalt_concrete
• aggregate - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construction_aggregate
• brick - https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Brick
• cement - https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Cement
• concrete - https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Concrete
• metal - https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Metal_in_construction
• mortar - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortar_(masonry)
• plywood - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plywood
• timber - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lumber
• resinAndPolymer - https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Polymers_in_construction, https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Resin, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resin
• soil - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil
• stone - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_(geology)

Notes

• Made a single aggregate code instead of having one for fine grain and one for coarse + rock
• removed Rock from aggregates and combined it with Stone
• removed masonry as it's not so much a material as the craft of building structures using material units, most commonly brick or stone, both of which have their own code.

[odscjen]

@jpmckinney @EvelynDinora just checking if either of you have any comments or objections to the altered modelling suggested in #405 (comment)?

Or to the code descriptions in #405 (comment) (also @mgraca-prado for these)

[jpmckinney]

Looks good. I suggest removing "or dirt" from soil. Although Wikipedia says so, it's easy to find sources that distinguish the two: basically, things can grow in soil, but not necessarily dirt (depending on its definition). But, if we need to cover dirt, I suppose we could keep it in the definition.

Cement, as defined, can include mortar. Not sure if anything to do about that.

Other small changes:

• Remove: used in a wide range of construction projects
• Remove: used in construction projects
• Remove: for use as a construction material
• aggregates used to surface -> aggregate, used to surface, for example,
• unit used to construct paving, walls and other building elements. -> unit, used to construct, for example, paving and walls.
• Change to "Metal, including" at the start of the metal description, just to make it a noun phrase, even if a repetitive one
• A composite paste using -> A composite paste, used
• Wood that has been processed -> Wood processed

[odscjen]

Thanks @jpmckinney I've updated the descriptions according to your suggestions.

I've left cement as is. In the case were the publisher is using cement as a mortar hopefully the standard they've based their test on will make it clear which code they should use.

[odscjen]

had a thumbs up from Maria and the ok from James (with suggestions which have now been applied) so I'm moving this to Agreed.

[odscjen]

waiting for #428 to be merged before starting PR for this.

[duncandewhurst]

waiting for #428 to be merged before starting PR for this.

Good to go :-)