Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

land compensation budget: specify budgte set aside for land compensation claims #407

Closed
odscjen opened this issue Oct 24, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #448
Closed

land compensation budget: specify budgte set aside for land compensation claims #407

odscjen opened this issue Oct 24, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #448
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@odscjen
Copy link
Contributor

odscjen commented Oct 24, 2023

Background

This issue relates to the following CoST IDS elements proposed in the CoST IDS/OC4IDS review:

Land compensation budget

Land compensation budget

Module: Social
Indicator: Land issues

Disclosure format

Disclose budget allocated to fund land compensation (E.g. [value]).

OC4IDS mapping

Project Level: Set .social.landCompensationBudget to the amount and currency of the budget allocated for land compensation.

Proposal

Add Value object to new social object (see #403) titled landCompensationBudget.

Add the following fields and objects:

Path Title Description Type (format) Codelist
social.landCompensationBudget Land compensation budget The budget allocated in the contract for compensation of land. Value object -

Example

{ 
 "social": { 
   "landCompensationBudget": { 
 	"amount": 1000000, 
 	"currency": "USD" 
   } 
 } 
} 

cc @EvelynDinora

@odscjen
Copy link
Contributor Author

odscjen commented Oct 31, 2023

@jpmckinney any objections or thoughts on this proposal?

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

Looks good!

Align field description with #406 (I think "allocated" can also come after "budget" in #406, and here if the "in the contract" phrasing is used).

@odscjen
Copy link
Contributor Author

odscjen commented Oct 31, 2023

updated description and as modelling previously agreed with CoST moving to Agreed cc @EvelynDinora @mgraca-prado

@odscjen odscjen moved this from Under discussion to Agreed in OC4IDS 0.9.4 Oct 31, 2023
@odscjen odscjen self-assigned this Nov 21, 2023
@odscjen odscjen moved this from Agreed to In Progress in OC4IDS 0.9.4 Nov 21, 2023
@odscjen
Copy link
Contributor Author

odscjen commented Nov 21, 2023

wait until #428 has been merged before creating PR as it contains the parent social object.

@odscjen odscjen moved this from In Progress to Agreed in OC4IDS 0.9.4 Nov 21, 2023
@odscjen odscjen assigned odscjen and unassigned odscjen Nov 21, 2023
@odscjen odscjen moved this from Agreed to Review in progress in OC4IDS 0.9.4 Nov 24, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Review in progress to Done in OC4IDS 0.9.4 Nov 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
3 participants