We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For example, in https://dqt.datlab.eu/resource/239/detail/reference.buyer_in_parties I can see that the first few examples in the sample of failures have meta/failed/reason set to "id missing" but I don't know if there are any other reasons for the failures.
meta/failed/reason
So that I can tell the publisher how to fix the issue, I need to know the reasons for checks failing.
The interface could include a breakdown of failure reasons, e.g.
id missing in buyer: 302,039 id not present in parties: 142,903
etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Related: open-contracting/pelican#35
Sorry, something went wrong.
Similarly, it would be good to have a summary of the failed_paths metadata in the coherent.dates check.
failed_paths
No branches or pull requests
For example, in https://dqt.datlab.eu/resource/239/detail/reference.buyer_in_parties I can see that the first few examples in the sample of failures have
meta/failed/reason
set to "id missing" but I don't know if there are any other reasons for the failures.So that I can tell the publisher how to fix the issue, I need to know the reasons for checks failing.
The interface could include a breakdown of failure reasons, e.g.
id missing in buyer: 302,039
id not present in parties: 142,903
etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: