-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
procurementCategory
and extendedProcurementCategory
: align and improve codes
#1525
Comments
Noting that the I think the common codes should be 100% the same, except substituting "additional objects ... are" for "primary object ... is". I guess we need to retain the caveat about 'services' in the extended list (viz its use in datasets that contain 'consultingServices'), though I'm not entirely sure about it. |
By "caveat" you mean the "on the basis of measurable outputs or deliverables"? If yes, why? |
I mean:
|
|
|
Looking for other definitions I found a relevant EU definition for Contract nature where services are defined as "Provision of services other than works and supplies." which if used as a basis could give us "The additional objects of this contracting (or planning) process are services other than goods or works. When the consultingServices code is also available or in use for data from a particular dataset, the service code must only be used for non-consulting services." I've removed the word "professional" from the description based on the common use of professional services as being those that require specialist skills or training and which excludes many services public bodies procure for, e.g. cleaning, catering, etc.
Ah, thanks |
Hmm, the EU definition is not very inspiring as it's just saying "anything that's not the other two". Can we research some other options? Edit: We can also follow the pattern in |
Noting that the codelist was authored in #376 (continued from #204). "goods" was edited in #828. Other changes to the codelist are not especially notable. The descriptions are currently:
The UNCITRAL model law's glossary has:
The World Bank's Procurement Regulations for Investment Project Financing (IPF) Borrowers November 2020 has:
Relevant to works, I also had a look at the EU's EEC 3037/90 (Section F), which makes it ways into the UK's Schedule 2. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goods_and_services. The WTO's GPA is not helpful. To avoid overlong definitions, I might suggest:
For goods, as mentioned in #376 and on Wikipedia, electricity is a good in the EU but a service in the US. Similarly, digital items are sometimes goods (if focusing on its consumption) and sometimes services (if focusing on how it is licensed and delivered, e.g. via a streaming service). For services, I maintained something like the EU definition for services, while adding a sentence to goods and works, since services occur in the supply of goods and works, but we don't want the definition to be interpreted as over-broad. For works, I kept the list (as before) from the World Bank, which is a longer version of the UNCITRAL list, plus it includes "repair, rehabilitation, restoration, maintenance", which is otherwise not present in the EU. The EU hierarchy includes some specifics like site preparation, installation, and completion, but I think these can be interpreted as part of a perhaps expansive interpretation of "construction". |
Those definitions look good to me. I'll hold off making the PR until #1530 has been merged |
The
procurementCategory
codes areThe
extendedProcurementCategory
codes areThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: