We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
num
str
ip
Is your feature request related to a problem?
PPL has unimplemented sorting syntax:
While this syntax is currently valid, it has no effect on the resulting sort order - sorting is always performed according to the field's data type.
Based on the discussion below, it seems like this would be a useful feature that would both easier to use, and consistent with sorting in Splunk.
What solution would you like?
auto
What alternatives have you considered?
Variety of alternatives, including deprecating this syntax completely, were discussed below.
Do you have any additional context?
Related to opensearch-project/sql#3180 (same issue for SQL).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
#963 Unimplemented PPL Sort Syntax (#994)
6610253
* Initial implementation Signed-off-by: currantw <[email protected]> * Revert `cast` changes. Signed-off-by: currantw <[email protected]> * Revert changes, and update to mark syntax as deprecated and add TODOs. Signed-off-by: currantw <[email protected]> * Revert some unintended changes, minor doc change. Signed-off-by: currantw <[email protected]> * Address review comments, including reverting some changes. Signed-off-by: currantw <[email protected]> * Update sample queries for correctness Signed-off-by: currantw <[email protected]> * Update to use `eval` for casting Signed-off-by: currantw <[email protected]> * Update to mark sort syntax as "unimplemented" rather than "deprecated". Signed-off-by: currantw <[email protected]> * Update integration test, clarify TODO comments. Signed-off-by: currantw <[email protected]> * Clarify test name, use multi-line string. Signed-off-by: currantw <[email protected]> * Fix failing `FlintSparkPPLParseITSuite` Signed-off-by: currantw <[email protected]> * Remove note completely Signed-off-by: currantw <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: currantw <[email protected]>
Updated for consistency with corresponding SQL issue: opensearch-project/sql#3180
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Is your feature request related to a problem?
PPL has unimplemented sorting syntax:
While this syntax is currently valid, it has no effect on the resulting sort order - sorting is always performed according to the field's data type.
Based on the discussion below, it seems like this would be a useful feature that would both easier to use, and consistent with sorting in Splunk.
What solution would you like?
num
,str
, andip
keywords.auto
keyword from sorting syntax (consensus seems to be that this isn't particularly useful).What alternatives have you considered?
Variety of alternatives, including deprecating this syntax completely, were discussed below.
Do you have any additional context?
Related to opensearch-project/sql#3180 (same issue for SQL).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: