Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Section 2.4 (comment 9) #533

Open
LPardue opened this issue Sep 13, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Section 2.4 (comment 9) #533

LPardue opened this issue Sep 13, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@LPardue
Copy link
Member

LPardue commented Sep 13, 2022

Section 2.4: We suggest rephrasing this sentence in order to clarify the exact minimum packet size. Does the suggested text change the meaning of the original sentence?

Original:

   A network path needs to be able to forward at least this size of
   packet for QUIC to be used.  

Perhaps:
A network path needs to be able to forward at least the size of
an Initial packet in order for QUIC to be used.

@mirjak
Copy link
Contributor

mirjak commented Sep 19, 2022

Yes, I think that alters the meeting because it seems to indicate that networks only need to enables initial packets to be this size.

I guess this could be better:

A network path needs to be able to forward at least this packet size for QUIC to be used.

Or even better:

A network path needs to be able to forward packets of at least this size for QUIC to be used.

@britram
Copy link
Contributor

britram commented Sep 20, 2022

+1 to your "even better"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants