Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove explain section for rp command #80

Open
prabhpreet opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Remove explain section for rp command #80

prabhpreet opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@prabhpreet
Copy link

prabhpreet commented May 16, 2024

On the main page, at the bottom, there is a section on the website mentioning rp explain for user to understand how rosenpass works

Explain command is no longer supported, see issue rosenpass/rosenpass#245

Either replace it with steps using rosenpass cli and wg command like the bash script did to explain manual setup. Or remove it altogether?

@AliceOrunitia
Copy link
Contributor

If the first option adds value to the user, we can do that, though it would require someone (not myself or Mullana) to produce so that we can prepare it for the website and update.

A set of notes and code in a standard markdown codebox would suffice :)

What would you prefer?

@prabhpreet
Copy link
Author

I can take care of creating the contents. Probably the bash syntax highlighting (that is currently there in the codebox?) should be good

We should do it when we release new rosenpass and rp binaries. I think the codebox currently on the website should be good!

@AliceOrunitia
Copy link
Contributor

Got you! I think I'll remove the section today, and we can replace it with the new one as and when. The CSS rules for the website are a bit strangely constructed, so I'm happy to move pure content myself. But yes, the highlighting is automatic

@AliceOrunitia
Copy link
Contributor

Site is updated, just ping me when the contents are available

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants