Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrading to the NiFi 2.0 #39

Open
peter279k opened this issue Dec 31, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #41
Open

Upgrading to the NiFi 2.0 #39

peter279k opened this issue Dec 31, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #41
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@peter279k
Copy link

As title, it seems that it uses the NiFi 1.x to build the cluster with the K8, do you have any plan to use the NiFi 2.0 to build the cluster with K8s? Thanks.

Copy link

👋 Thanks for Reporting!

@saidsef saidsef self-assigned this Dec 31, 2024
@saidsef saidsef added the question Further information is requested label Dec 31, 2024
@saidsef
Copy link
Owner

saidsef commented Dec 31, 2024

Hi @peter279k, I've just started testing that this week with a view of releasing it once I'm sure the bootstrap works as expected. With version 2.x there breaking changes.

So far, just minor changes, I think I'll skip 2.0 and release 2.1.x early next year.

Happy New Year 🎉

@peter279k
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your reply. You can release new k8s-nifi-cluster for 2.1.x version next year!

Happy New Year 🎆.

@saidsef saidsef linked a pull request Dec 31, 2024 that will close this issue
7 tasks
@peter279k
Copy link
Author

@saidsef, I also have the docker-compose-file.yml file and I think it can help you to upgrade to the NiFi 2.1.0 version :).

@saidsef
Copy link
Owner

saidsef commented Jan 4, 2025

@peter279k, locally I'm using kind for testing and deployment the Kubernetes manifests in deployment directory:

kind create cluster --name nifi
kubeclt apply -k deployment/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants