You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Domain: localhost:3000
Browser: Firefox 62
OS: Void Linux
Scenario
Start a SPA application (for example using React)
Save a file via the front-end application
Open a file saver popup
File is saved
=> OK
Enable dat-fox extensions
Save a file via the front-end application
Expected Result
The browser tries to save a file by showing the pop-up to save a file
Actual Result
Saving the file gives an error URL.createObjectURL is not a function (we are using FileSaver.js and that library is throwing that error) and doesn't open the file saver popup.
Extra information
I noticed that this is only a problem when developing locally on the application, when we create a production build and push to our development instance on AWS we don't have this issue.
Is the extension overriding browser globals? Is there any weird behavior you can think of using localhost?
If you need any more information, I'll try to provide it for you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The extension initially assumes the dat gateway is running on localhost:3000, until the process finishes starting up and communicates its actual port. If you are running other services on port 3000 they may have received some requests from the extension in this time. Does this possibly explain your issue?
General information
Domain: localhost:3000
Browser: Firefox 62
OS: Void Linux
Scenario
=> OK
Expected Result
The browser tries to save a file by showing the pop-up to save a file
Actual Result
Saving the file gives an error
URL.createObjectURL is not a function
(we are using FileSaver.js and that library is throwing that error) and doesn't open the file saver popup.Extra information
I noticed that this is only a problem when developing locally on the application, when we create a production build and push to our development instance on AWS we don't have this issue.
Is the extension overriding browser globals? Is there any weird behavior you can think of using localhost?
If you need any more information, I'll try to provide it for you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: