Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
I've been informed "пшкф" is unicode that gets transliterated to NSFW. So probably that. Someone is trying to circumvent the filter while submitting a barely NSFW prompt at low rez that would breeze through anyway. Likely a new user. But that's a lame trigger for a non-extant filter. Also still don't understand where this filter is. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The end user could enable the NSFW filter by their own, like When this option was enabled in the incoming request, the extension would enable the NSFW filter no matter the SD-WebUI side have set the NSFW or not. So this is not the fault of the extension itself or even yours, the extension just following the request from end users. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I received this message on the console for an incoming request from the horde. My question is, was this returned to the horde and then onto the requestor? Why wasn't it honored? Although informative to me, it's not actionable by me. NSFW is enabled so this surprised me. I don't know where it came from. I have no NSFW content blocks enabled in A1111. I'll put the prompt requested below. It does not seem offensive.
Potential NSFW content was detected in one or more images. A black image will be returned instead. Try again with a different prompt and/or seed.
The request. I don't know what the 4 character non-english part is. Google didn't either.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions